Saturday, January 27, 2007

SINGAPORE



The following is a running dialogue from our recent trip, comprised of notes and photos taken while we were there and some commentary that I’ve added upon returning home...

Our arrival into Singapore was perhaps the easiest arrival to a destination we've experienced. While it may have taken virtually 24 hours of travel to get there, once we arrived, the airport and subway, both modern and easy to navigate, which is a running theme in Singapore, delivered us to our hotel's doorstep in no time at all and for about $1 US. Certainly a far cry from landing in Lima, Peru and trying to sort out a taxi ride with relentless drivers coming at you, most looking to rip you off. Some people derisively call Singapore a sterile city. And while it doesn't have the frenetic pulse (or pollution) like other Asian cities we've visited, such as Bangkok or even Kuala Lumpur, which we visited later in the trip, it does have a lot going for it. In many ways Singapore is the prototypical modern 21st century metropolis. It has the before mentioned modern transportation system, the modern skyline, and the general cleanliness not seen in any other urban setting. Mix in the colonial architecture that contrasts with the uber-modern designs, the tropical temperatures and greenery that juxtapose the urban landscape and the diversity of the people - a mix of Chinese, Malay and Indian - and it's really unlike any other city. For some it's the right mixture and for others they are put off. For me, I’m clearly the former as I took to it right away, feeling comfortable and very at home with the surroundings. Of course you still have to be careful not to litter or chew gum, lest you get the cane. Actually, despite its reputation as having many rules and strictly enforcing them, we hardly saw any police and we did in fact see some people littering. So either they are surveilling their citizens using high-tech and these people were rounded up later, or things are a little more easy going than the reputation. We decided not to push our luck by testing that theory though, as we were law abiding visitors.

After our seamless arrival, unpacking, and a brief sigh from the 18+ hours of plane flights (SFO to Taipei to Singapore), we rallied and took a walk around Little India our first night. As you would expect it was replete with plenty of Indian shops and Indian people. Though mostly Indian men. In fact it became a running joke, as K was virtually the only woman we saw for hours and I was the only man without a mustache. The only way we did fit in was that we were holding hands, which oddly enough most of the Indian men were as well. It was sort of like an Indian version of the Castro, complete with the brightly colored buildings, though I don't think the implied meaning of the hand holding gesture was the same. We did eventually discover that all the Indian women were in fact around, simply inside the air-conditioned malls shopping. Seeing as it was sweltering hot and humid outside, a strong case could be made, using this as an example, that women are in fact smarter than men. As we would discover, shopping, as well as eating, are practically the national pastimes in Singapore. Speaking of eating, we ate at one of the many food courts, called hawker stalls, our first night. Basically a sort of hybrid of a farmer's market and food courts at the mall, though more along the lines of farmer's markets in that everything is homemade and clearly mom & pop shops. We steered clear of the turtle soup, but did have some tasty bites nonetheless. We managed to make it up to about 10p that first night, trying to stay up late enough to get ourselves on the right time zone, as Singapore is 16 hours ahead of SF, so we essentially lost an entire day flying.

On Monday, we set out on another walking excursion, which is more or less how we see big cities when we travel. Between walking around Singapore and then later Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia, we literally probably walked at least 20 miles between the 2 cities. On this day we first headed to the Colonial area of town, which is situated near the waterfront downtown. We somehow stumbled into an underground mall, which was massive. Most of the stores were closed it was so early, but because it was air-conditioned, people were using it as a thruway to get around the city. We then again stumbled into the Esplanade, the large modern theater in Singapore nicknamed "The Durians" for it's resemblance to the spiky (and stinky) fruit by that name (more on durians in the next post). At that point we sort of had a stop and start to our walk as K had to give up on the flip flops (her feet weren't quite ready for the lack of support given the miles we were putting on) and head back to the hotel so she could grab her sneaks. The jet lag sort of caught up with us as the return trip (and the sight of a bed) necessitated a brief nap, but we soon rallied, heading out again this time to Chinatown. After cruising some of the shops, which remarkably had very similar junk to what's sold in SF's Chinatown, we found a great place to get some dim sum (again keeping with Singapore's pastimes of shopping + eating).

Later that afternoon we made our way back downtown to the waterfront area to check out the Asian Civilization museum, which features art from SE Asia, China, and India. In addition to some interesting art from the region, it had some pretty cool interactive video displays, and it was also very air-conditioned, which made it a nice (cool) break from all the walking. Singapore's population is about 75% Chinese, with the rest being Malay and Indian. Despite being an Asian city, everything is in English - street signs, billboards, directions, etc, and everyone speaks English. It is in fact their unofficial official language. So in that way it doesn't feel so foreign, and is probably one of the things people cite when they knock the city as too sterile, but from a traveler's perspective, or at least a traveler who speaks English, it makes it quite easy to get around. That is if you bother to figure out where you're going. That night we were attempting to visit the night safari out at the zoo but, no thanks to our Lonely Planet guide, we didn't allow enough time to get out there and see the safari before turning around to catch the last train home. So instead we ended up taking a very long subway ride around the city before aborting and heading to an ex-pat indie rock pub in Little India for a beverage. As a side note I would just say that the 2003 Malaysia/Singapore Lonely Planet guide is crap. LP is our travel book of choice and by and large has always done us right, but this one really didn't pass the test. It's lousy on so many fronts it's not worth detailing. They just released a new version this month, unfortunately too late for us, so hopefully it's better than the one we had.

Tuesday morning we set out on a train for Malaysia with our destination being Taman Negara, a large national park in the rainforest. More on Singapore when we return at the end of the trip. More on Malaysia in the next post in a few days. If you want to be notified automatically when I add the next post, simply add your email address into the box on the upper right, or subscribe to the feed.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, January 02, 2007

NFL RECAP - AFC PICKS

As promised, the AFC recap of my preseason picks.

AFC EAST

The pick: NEW ENGLAND
The winner: NEW ENGLAND

What I got right: "While Miami has a nice squad...Culpepper won't be the difference maker for them...even without Branch, Tom Brady is good enough to figure out how to get it done."

What I got wrong: "The Jets have issues at QB and could very well be in the mix for the worst record in the league."

Grade: A-
I got the pick right, predicted that Culpepper would flop and Miami wasn't the chic pick to win the division that everyone seemed to think they were. The Jets, like New Orleans in the NFC, were a big surprise so I won't penalize myself too much for not predicting their wildcard run.

AFC NORTH

The pick: PITTSBURGH
The winner: BALTIMORE

What I got right: "Cincinnati has more talent than Pittsburgh...but will they live up to the high expectations? In Baltimore this is the make or break year for Brian Billick. In Cleveland they are still a team looking to assemble some building blocks for the future. This team won't be good but could catch a few people by surprise if they take them too lightly."

What I got wrong: "I don't think the arrival of McNair will make the difference...The Ravens will be in the mix for the wild card but won't get over the hump in the deep AFC. I think Pittsburgh will take the division but an injury here or there and this team very well might not even make the playoffs to defend their title."

Grade: D-
In my defense I did note that I could see Pittsburgh missing the playoffs entirely. Though I somehow stupidly still picked them to win the division. I had Cincy pegged for a wildcard slot so that wasn't too far off (more on that below). But I get the D because I didn't see the 13-3 season from Baltimore. I was thinking more along the lines of 9-7 and missing out on the last wildcard.

AFC SOUTH

The pick: INDIANAPOLIS
The winner: INDIANAPOLIS

What I got right: "The Colts should again run up a nice regular season record as Peyton Manning proves he's the best QB at winning in the regular season. Even without Edgerrin James in the backfield they are still loaded offensively. In Houston...all the talk is about why they drafted Super Mario instead of Reggie Bush. The two will be linked this year, as people will be watching to see just how big of blunder the Texans made by passing on the Heisman winner. This team is...not ready for primetime."

What I got wrong: "In Tennessee it could be a couple of years before we see Vince Young be as effective and electric as he was at UT. The fact that Jeff Fisher brought in Kerry Collins, presumably to start, means Vince is nowhere near ready yet. The Titans are another squad that looks to be in the running for worst record, as they are clearly in rebuilding mold."

Grade: A-
Much like the AFC EAST, I got the pick right, but like the Jets I didn't see the Titans surprise season coming. Granted they didn't get into the playoffs, but 8-8 was a breakout year for them considering the low expectations. Vince Young proved he's a winner at the pro level as well. Unlike in Tennessee, 8-8 in Jax was a disappointment. I thought they would nab a wildcard spot, but they were more unsettled at QB than I expected and they couldn't get it done on the road this year (2-6).

AFC WEST

The pick: DENVER
The winner: SAN DIEGO

What I got right: "The West in my opinion could be wide open. Clearly Denver is at the head of the class, but question marks about which Bell will be in the backfield and whether Jay Cutler could potentially supplant Jake Plummer as starting QB could disrupt the squad...San Diego rolled the dice and let Drew Brees go to New Orleans so they could make way for the Philip Rivers era. If he's the real deal San Diego could be the sleeper pick to win the division or a wild card berth...KC will be in the wild card mix. The team not in the mix is the Raiders...this team will stink."

What I got wrong: "In the end Denver is too talented not to win the division..."

Grade: C-
Other than the pick, I actually had a lot right here. I was sniffing out the SD surprise but didn't go with my gut and pick them. I thought Denver was a playoff team, and perhaps if they had gone with Cutler from the start of the season they might have at least won a wildcard. The low grade is based on San Diego's NFL best 14-2 record and the fact that I had them out of the playoffs. Ouch.

WILDCARD

The picks: JACKSONVILLE & CINCINNATI
The winners: NEW YORK & KANSAS CITY

What I got right: "Whichever 2 teams do notch the wild card will have to put up a good fight that could go down to the last weekend of the season. The teams I expect to be in the mix are Miami, Cincy, Baltimore, Jax, KC and San Diego."

What I got wrong: "I think Jacksonville will earn the first and based on their talent alone Cincy will figure out a way to get the second and last berth."

Grade: D
This grade would have been much better had Cincy not missed kicks (a game-tying PAT in week 16 and a game-winning FG in week 17) that cost them an eventual wildcard berth. Even with the missed PAT that could have forced OT two weeks ago, they had a 39-yard FG to beat Pittsburgh, which as they found out later when Denver lost to SF, would have put them in as the last wildcard. I did think KC would be in the mix, but again had no clue the Jets would get it done.

AFC record: 2-4

Overall record: 4-8

Only 4 teams right isn't great. If you just look at division winners (I was 0-4 in the wildcard slots) I was 4-4 or if you look at overall playoff picks (counting that I had both Philly and Dallas in the playoffs, just flip-flopped as the division winner vs. wildcard seeding) my record was 6-6. In both cases .500 is tolerable. So grading on a curve, I give myself an overall C+ grade.

Revised playoff picks later this week.

Labels: , ,

Monday, January 01, 2007

NFL RECAP - NFC PICKS

Since the NFL regular season is in the books, time to take a look back and grade my preseason picks, starting with the NFC.

NFC EAST

The pick: DALLAS
The winner: PHILLY

What I got right: "The Eagles, coming off a disastrous 6-10 season, have shed T.O. and Andy Reid has turned over the roster. Most pundits are writing them off...but the team looks like they have something to prove and all signs point to them making their statement. The Skins now have plenty of playmakers but they are still hinging their success on the arm of Mark Brunell. Unfortunately for them Brunell is done, which means so are the Redskins. A trendy pick to win the division, despite their dismal preseason, in my book they'll finish last."

What I got wrong: "New York won't make the playoffs...at the end of the day defense will rule and the big D in Dallas will clinch the title."

Grade: B
I didn't get the pick right, but I did get a lot more right than wrong. I wanted to go with my heart and pick Philly to win the division outright, instead I softened and just gave them the wildcard berth. Happy to be wrong in this case.

NFC NORTH

The pick: CHICAGO
The winner: CHICAGO

What I got right: "Everyone's hands down pick, the Bears, have the defense that makes them a lock for the division, but looking beyond that they have some big questions on the other side of the ball, most notably at QB. Is Rex Grossman their long-term answer? While the Bears have some questions the rest of the division has no answers."

What I got wrong: "Of the 3 bottom dwellers Detroit seems to be headed in the right direction..."

Grade: A+
Pretty much all over this one. Green Bay sported a better record than I thought they would, but in the immortal words of Dennis Green, "they were who we thought they were."

NFC SOUTH

The pick: CAROLINA
The winner: NEW ORLEANS

What I got right: "...the wheels officially haven fallen off the Michael Vick bandwagon...The acquisition of Drew Brees, a great signing if he stays healthy, gives them a trio of Bush, Brees and Joe Horn that will make some plays."

What I got wrong: "The Saints will become America's team this year, but the feel good story will stop there as despite the arrival of some big name stars in town the rest of the talent isn't there, especially on defense. This team won't win much, but should be fun to watch and root for. Most have anointed Carolina as the team to beat in the NFC and for good reason."

Grade: F
Like most people, I missed the boat with the Saints. I thought they would stink and they were great. I thought Carolina would be great and they stunk.

NFC WEST

The pick: SEATTLE
The winner: SEATTLE

What I got right: "An injury to Shaun Alexander or Hasselbeck or a slow start and we could see this team unravel...I just think the rest of the division is too weak to let that happen. The chic pick to challenge Seattle is Arizona. The fact that the o-line was down right horrible last year should put a wet blanket on the party."

What I got wrong: "And in SF the only good thing that can be said is that they should be looking at another high draft pick this year, which given their lack of overall talent is a good thing."

Grade: A-
Like the NFC North I was pretty much all over this one. I expected Seattle to struggle, and they did. I though St. Louis might sneak up and challenge and they almost did. I thought people were overrating Arizona and I was right. SF was the miss, as they were better than I expected, hence the A- grade.

WILDCARD

The picks: PHILADELPHIA & TAMPA
The winners: DALLAS & NEW YORK

What I got right: "Depending on how the chips fall the East could boast both wild card berths and 3 playoff teams."

What I got wrong: "And in the other slot look for Tampa Bay to edge out St. Louis and slide into the second berth."

Grade: C- I was sniffing this one out but didn't have the gumption to slot the 2nd and 3rd place finishers in the East as the Wildcard winners. I picked Dallas to win the division and Philly to snag the top wildcard, which was close but no cigar as they were flip-flopped. With Tampa I was just dead wrong as they looked lost even before Simms got hurt. That and the fact that I thought the Giants would miss the playoffs determined the C- grade.

NFC record: 2-4

AFC recap tomorrow.

Labels: , ,